Anyway, I was making the point that in order to believe what God has done, we must first hear about it. But simply hearing about it is not enough; many hear the message of God's mighty works and still refuse to believe. This calls into question why some believe and others do not.
I went on to share with my family my thoughts on the matter. It seems to me that if some hearers believe, while there are others who do not, there are really only three explanations. I put the three options in the first person for purposes of illustration:
- I am smarter than all those non-believers, and as a result was able to figure out what they had not figured out.
- I am better than all those non-believers, and therefore did not have my judgment clouded by sin the way they did.
- By his grace and for his own purposes, God chose to work savingly in me in a way that he did not work in non-believers.
1 comment:
Looks like the first two each have a traditional name. The way I see them are, (1) gnosticism, and (2) pelagianism. Would you agree?
What other early heresies were soteriological in their essence? Would they bear on this discussion?
('The wit of man is insufficient to invent a new heresy.' -Chesterton)
('There is nothing new under the sun.' - Solomon)
Post a Comment