Showing posts with label ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ethics. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Should a Christian Display a Portrait of Robert E. Lee?

Don’t read this post. That’s right. I don’t want you to read this post. What I’d much rather have you do is click over to Russell Moore’s post today regarding whether a Christian should display a picture of Robert E. Lee in their home.

Dr. Moore is the Dean of the School of Theology and Senior Vice-President for Academic Administration at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. From time to time on his blog, Moore to the Point, he posts ethical questions he’s received, allows time for readers to give their feedback and then gives his own answer. His answers inevitably display a depth of gospel wisdom that almost makes me wish I was a Baptist.

Today’s post was, in my opinion, the best answer of his that I have read to date. He makes one great point after another. Again, I really would urge you to read the whole article, but if you must have the abridged version, here are some of the highlights:

He argues against the oversimplification of historical figures and warns us against both demonizing those we see as “villains” and canonizing those we see as “heroes.”
The fetishistic use of historical figures is precisely what leads to the kind of “absolute good vs. absolute evil” characterizations we often see among Christians in the way they view current leaders…That’s the kind of hagiography that led to George Washington’s cherry tree inability to tell a lie. Well, George Washington was a great man, but he was also a liar. And so am I, and so are you. Unless there was a star shining over Washington’s birthplace (and there wasn’t), then Romans 3:10-19 applies to him as well as to all of us.
So should a Christian display a picture of Robert E. Lee in their home?
I don’t know. I can’t tell you one way or the other because what’s more important than a single picture is the general ethos of a home…The issue is love of neighbor and the mission of Christ. That’s why the Apostle Paul refuses to lay down simple rules about eating vegetables or eating meat (Rom. 14:1-23). If that picture would hinder your being able to show hospitality and love with your brothers and sisters of every background and race, take it down.

But, if you keep it up on the wall, let it be, like every historical portrait, a warning…(For) a gentleman as devoted to character as Robert E. Lee, who had thought long and hard about the evils of slavery, was so conditioned by his time that he couldn’t see past his blind spot. So what makes me think that I could have escaped a similar blind spot? And what is so common in our culture right now that we can’t even see it, as we think we’re serving the Lord?
Moore concludes with this:
Robert E. Lee was a complicated figure, a sinful rebel (in more ways than one) who bore the image of God. And so are we. Lee was gifted in commendable ways even as he used those gifts sometimes in ways that ought to horrify. So do we. We ought to be honest, in both directions, about Lee and about our neighbors and ourselves. And that ought to cause us to search out our own lives for that hidden sin, that secret hatred, that conforming to the pattern of this age that we don’t see and don’t think to ask about. Ultimately, no matter how we seek to whitewash our heritage or our personal stories, we’ll only conquer it all at the resurrection from the dead. Until then, we watch our hearts, pray for wisdom, work for justice, and love our neighbor.

Deep in my heart, I do believe that we shall overcome some day.

Friday, February 26, 2010

The Goodness of God

I am re-reading the book Biblical Christian Ethics by David Clyde Jones in preparation for a Sunday School class I am teaching and it pointed me to these two great quotes on the great depth of the goodness of God and its sufficiency for our joy:

First, from John Calvin in his Institutes of the Christian Religion (3.25.10)...
If God contains the fullness of all good things in himself like an inexhaustible fountain, nothing beyond him is to be sought by those who strive after the highest good and all the elements of happiness… If the Lord will share his glory, power, and righteousness with the elect – nay, will give himself to be enjoyed by them and, what is more excellent, will somehow make them to become one with humself, let us remember that every sort of happiness is included under this benefit.
Then this, from Augustine in The City of God (XXII.30)...

True peace shall be there, where no one shall suffer opposition either from himself or any other. God himself, who is the Author of virtue, shall there be its reward; for, as there is nothing greater or better, He has promised himself. What else was meant by His word through the prophet, “I will be your God, and ye shall be my people,” than, “I shall be their satisfaction, I shall be all that men honorably desire” – life, and health, and nourishment, and plenty, and glory, and honor, and peace, and all good things? This, too, is the right interpretation of the apostle, ‘That God may be in all.’ He shall be the end of our desires who shall be seen without end, loved without cloy, praised without weariness. This outgoing affection, this employment, shall certainly be, like eternal life itself, common to all.
And finally, from the Heidelberg Catechism (Q&A 58)...
What comfort do you derive from the article of the life everlasting?

That, since I now feel in my heart the beginning of eternal joy, after this life I shall possess perfect bliss, such as eye has not seen nor ear heard, neither has entered into the heart of man - therein to praise god forever.
May these truths increase in us a hunger for holiness today and a longing for the Lord's return. Come, Lord Jesus!